Professor Says Pro-life Fetal Images Are Child Pornography

Professor Says Pro-life Fetal Images Are Child Pornography

The new argument a professor is making out of Purdue University is not only confusing and contradicting but doesn’t even help to support his Pro-choice agenda. Dr. David Sanders now accuses a pro-choice organization of “child pornography” for using images of dead fetuses as a rhetorical device during a debate at Purdue University. Who thinks to consider the images of an unborn child as pornographic? Who thinks to make a connection between child pornography and the preservation of life? Dr. David Sanders does and perhaps didn’t even think that by doing so he would support the Pro-life argument because he didn’t call it “fetus or zygote pornography”, he called it child.

Read the full story HERE.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s